Is it true that parties may not seek recognition of a judgment in another jurisdiction once it is properly rendered?

The assertion that parties may not seek recognition of a judgment in another jurisdiction once it is properly rendered is false. In legal practice, it is quite common for parties to seek recognition and enforcement of judgments across jurisdictions. This process is often referred to as "domestication" or "recognition" of foreign judgments.

When a judgment is rendered in one jurisdiction, the parties involved can file a petition in another jurisdiction to have that judgment recognized and enforced, provided that certain criteria are met. The key aspects that influence whether a judgment can be recognized include the jurisdiction's laws regarding foreign judgments, the fairness of the original trial, and whether proper jurisdiction and notice were given in the initial proceedings.

Additionally, several legal doctrines, such as the Full Faith and Credit Clause in the United States, support the principle of recognizing judgments from one state in another state, fostering consistency and respect for judicial authority. Therefore, it is entirely possible and often necessary for parties to seek recognition of a judgment in different jurisdictions after it has been rendered.